No One Knows Less About the Web Than Microsoft

Every web designer in the world knows that Microsoft Internet Explorer (IE) is by far the worst browser available. It is the least secure. It has the worst feature set. It has by far the worst implementation of all web standards, most notably CSS. It has full access to the operating system’s core libraries (on Windows systems) and is still not the fastest or best. There is no excuse for this. They simply don’t care, nor do they care their apathy holds the entire world back in the stone ages technologically.

Microsoft IE version 6 is literally famous for being the worst browser ever made. Every designer has to make a pivotal decision in their work: “Will I support IE6 or not?” Every single designer knows about this issue. Getting into the list of CSS bugs is pointless because there are whole sites devoted to this laborious topic and have been for well over a decade. The whole web community has been gnashing their teeth against IE since version 4, and nothing has changed in later versions.

I bet most non web designers don’t know all of what it takes to design a page. It should be easy. HTML? CSS? Jquery? PHP? Whatever else technology with a standard, recommendation or language? Fairly cut and dry. Most of a designer’s job is to make an ordinarily simple page work in IE, writing all sorts of convoluted code to accommodate it. Seriously. No exaggeration. This is actually true, and it’s ANNOYING! Sometimes it can be fun to challenge oneself to write cryptic junk to work in IE… but it gets old when you want to make something look cool or use a nice feature that’s been in web technologies for many years that IE can’t do.

There is thankfully a movement out there where people are FINALLY throwing in the towel, giving up supporting IE fully in their designs. They’ll display a message like, “You need to update your browser” when IE is detected. In order for designers to visualize their stylistic and functional dreams, this is necessary. And it’s about time. Unfortunately Microsoft is also notoriously the worst and last to implement an auto-updating browser. Which means that those who have ancient browsers will not get updated automatically (or at least notified of an update) in the background like all the others.

Because IE is built into Windows, most people simply use it. Some people don’t even know there are alternatives out there, like Firefox, Chrome, Opera, and the like. You name a browser, and I can pretty much guarantee that it’s better than IE.

K, old news, I know. And what I’m about to add to it is old too… but I didn’t really read up on it until now.

Outlook, yet another Microsoft invention relating to web technology (an email client, duh!), is also GARBAGE when it comes to displaying rich content like HTML. A few years ago I started noticing that when I sent an HTML email out, and someone forwarded it back to me with a response… it looked like crap. I know the standard thing that when you forward a rich email, it adds a bunch of junk lines and spaces and loses some features and images. That’s kinda what I thought was happening until I started using Outlook as my primary client at work.

The HTML emails look like junk as received initially, even though much care is taken to use old table design and minimal basic CSS (unfortunately this is necessary for MOST email clients).

Guess what? Outlook 2007 and later versions SIGNIFICANTLY DECREASED (not increased, as you would think) their CSS support from their own previous versions of Outlook (which were already the worst among others in their support). This is documented fact that Outlook 2007 has far worse CSS support than version 2003 and all other previous versions. Version 2010 has the exact same sickness.

Here are some shocking links that tell of how bad the situation is in Microsoft Outlook:

http://www.webpronews.com/kiss-your-css-goodbye-with-outlook-2007-01

http://www.campaignmonitor.com/css/

Sigh… the web technology team at Microsoft needs to give up the ghost and let the world progress on its own. They are holding everyone back.

By the way, if you didn’t figure it out already, ban using Microsoft Internet Explorer and download a free alternative, like Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Opera, Safari, anything. They are all FREE, better, faster, more secure, and web pages will simply look better and function properly on them (except for the occasional badly designed page that uses Microsoft proprietary features – which is NEVER beneficial or necessary).

2 thoughts on “No One Knows Less About the Web Than Microsoft”

  1. Amen. I didn’t know about the Outlook thing… that’s crazy annoying. I really want to switch everyone at work to Google Apps, that way they at least have an option to use an amazingly awesome interface instead of Outlook.

  2. The one thing Microsoft has achieved with great success is to create a point of connection between all designers, no matter their differences and skill levels. We can all rally behind a common cause, or rather a funny joke… which is Microsoft’s web technologies (a very painful joke).

    Microsoft SUCKS at this stuff! It’s hilarious to read how people describe the situation because it is so crazy that the richest software company would consistently write such horrible applications.

    As others have stated, the cause of this malady is that Microsoft made the horrifically loony choice to depart from basing the Outlook HTML engine on their web browser (IE). Probably for security reasons because both Outlook and IE are notably bad in this area. I realize that sounds like a contradiction because IE is indeed the worst browser in rendering HTML and CSS. But even IE would be halfway decent for email rendering because for some dumb reason email specifications are way behind web browser technology (except for the magnificent Mozilla Thunderbird). Instead, Outlook is now based entirely on Microsoft Word, which has hideous HTML and CSS capabilities. The whole thing is laughable.

    Here are more links to great articles on the subject. It’s quite comical and endearing to see how everyone feels the same exact way about this topic. If camaraderie was the goal, Microsoft should get a medal… and then they should be kicked out of the game for their atrocities against the web community in general. Even a really professional writer (I’m not) would have a hard time not bashing Microsoft in comical form. A mere boring regurgitation of the facts reads like a comedy. Microsoft’s actions literally make no sense at all and seem unplanned. If there is a plan or committee behind all this, they seem to be guided by antagonism, anarchy, disorder and destruction. Like, “Let’s see how bad we can mess everyone up and then blame everyone else. We have the market share, so we can do whatever we want! It’ll be fun to see how far this sets everyone back. It doesn’t matter how much better every competitor is; our edge is being the lowest common denominator that everyone must specifically code for – gives us PRIDE to be given such personal attention.” …and so on.

    http://www.sitepoint.com/microsoft-breaks-html-email-rendering-in-outlook/

    http://www.domainmonster.com/editorials/outlook_2007_html/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*